![]() ![]() The content producers have been able to get pretty fat and lazy thanks to the inertia of traditional linear television delivery systems. Those dusty old cable boxes, as it stands today. The only way this will ever truly get better is when the mastering of content for "linear" delivery is not limited to the lowest common denominator.Bitrate means nothing without context (i.e., efficiency of codec).There are takeaways from your post that I always try to point out to people: Appreciate the effort that goes into them. I remember reading some of your earlier posts about hockey, and the Super Bowl. The stream they are providing to streaming services and cable tv providers is just as bad as the OTA broadcast. ![]() All of this bandwidth used to be used for one HD channel. For example, the NBC affiliate (WCAU) broadcast is sharing bandwidth with 4 SD channels and another HD channel. I'll start: The network affiliates in the Philadelphia market are providing a substandard service. ![]() Maybe we can leave the "it's the bitrate" thing behind and start naming the local network affiliates, cable tv networks, ISPs, or whatever else is responsible for the low picture quality? Both valid complaints, but one is normal behavior and the other is the service not working correctly at all. It's hard to know if someone is annoyed because they are seeing a 240p blocky mess, or if they are annoyed because the football field is little blurry and lacking detail. Picture quality was essentially the same.įor anyone who is seeing differently it would be great if you can share some images and data so maybe we can get a better idea of what is going on. However, YouTube TV is using a ~50% more efficient video codec. TLDR: During my 30 minute testing window Hulu Live TV did use 22.8% more bits to deliver the same video. I have compared all of the providers multiple times over the past few years and this didn't match up at all with my experience so I decided to take a deeper look. There have been a lot of comments recently about how "YouTube TV's bitrate is too low" and that this is the reason for all of the issues people are having with the service. Friends of YouTubeTV r/cordcutters r/bestofhulu r/Hulu r/PhiloTV r/YoutubeMusic To view the spoiler, simply hover your cursor over the text. Comment SpoilersĪdd the scope of the spoiler in the brackets. Please read and follow our Rules when posting. No posts about Fox News, MSNBC, or CNN.īreaking any of the rules can result in a permanent ban. Constructive feedback is welcome aggressive complaining is not. Posts and comments that are needlessly negative or hostile toward YTTV may be removed. No posts/comments about location spoofing, VPN hijinks, ad blockers, or things that break YTTV's Terms of Service. No posts/comments about piracy, account sharing, or purchasing grandfathered accounts. Low-quality content will be removed without warning. No rude, offensive, or hateful posts/comments. Welcome to the best place to talk about YouTube TV! Discord ServerĬlick here if the image doesn't show up Rules 1. This was because we thought analysing packets during Flow Completion Time is the correct method of packet filtering youtbe video streaming.◈ Rules ◈ FAQ ◈ Continue Watching: a Streaming TV Community ◈ Welcome to r ̸ YouTubeTV We combined this filter with frame.number filter in order to identify the first SYN packet and the last Pakcet in order to only capture between those two designated SYN packets. We used HTTPS protocol and we included tcp.port = 80 since we found packets on port 80 which we assume were related to youtube video we were trying to packet filter. ** filter : tcp.port = 443 or tcp.port = 80 ![]() However, we are not confident with our methods and we would like to ask for your advice.Īll of our team members are using Windows 7 and Chrome web browser for this task. I and my group were given a task to packet filter 'youtube' video traffics and we came out withįollowing method from reading number of threads in wireshark forum and our own research. I am a student studying network & security. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |